Dr Hawking spent 40 years of his life trying to discover the theory of everything and until now he failed to do so , he admit he might not find it in his lifetime, and someone else might discover it ! I feel so sad for him because The theory of everything has been discovered already and it is in the front of his eyes all this time , but he couldn’t see it ! It is God himself . It is the the great living light of the creation, he is the Alpha and the Omega ,and he is the theory of everything.
I would say that Hawking’s claim is misguided. He asks us to choose between God and the laws of physics, as if they were necessarily in mutual conflict.
Hawking made the stunning claim that material which falls into a black hole disappears forever. If correct, it would mean that the fundamental laws of the universe would have to be rewritten. From the point of view of a quantum theorist, like Susskind, this was impossible: the central principle of quantum mechanics is that information can never be annihilated.
My hypothesis a simple one ; I call it the The multi dimensional helix strings theory ; It can be activated by light , so it is like God is trying to show us that his light is the base of the creation ,and the DNA can evolve and make all the living things including the universe as it is multiple strings each with different code and data according to the material will be evolved to. Let me explain how this work. Can we see it now , of course NO. It is like the big bang theory it happened to start the universe, and this is the big bang of DNA it happened and the evolution take over and it will reach a fix point where things will either stop evolving or go back and devolve all-over again.
DNA has a single purpose: to store the information necessary to guide the growth and maintenance of a living organism. It stores that information in an ordered series of nuclear bases, four different molecules called adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine — usually abbreviated A, T, C and G. The differences between a salmonella bacterium, a kelp plant and an elephant are all driven by differences in the order of the bases in the DNA of each of those organisms.
The first job of DNA is to make sure the order of bases is preserved, so organisms develop the way they’re supposed to.And the same with non organism material these multi helix strings will take the shape of tiny particles with electrons and protons and other particles.Some of the smaller bacterium can eat electron and their food is the electron and the electric energy and that is will known to science.
Unlike any other life on Earth, these extraordinary bacteria use energy in its purest form – they eat and breathe electrons – and they are everywhere
Stick an electrode in the ground, pump electrons down it, and they will come: living cells that eat electricity. We have known bacteria to survive on a variety of energy sources, but none as weird as this. Think of Frankenstein’s monster, brought to life by galvanic energy, except these “electric bacteria” are very real and are popping up all over the place they call them Shewanella and Geobacter.
We eat sugars that have excess electrons, and we breathe in oxygen that willingly takes them.” Our cells break down the sugars, and the electrons flow through them in a complex set of chemical reactions until they are passed on to electron-hungry oxygen.In the process, cells make ATP, a molecule that acts as an energy storage unit for almost all living things. Moving electrons around is a key part of making ATP.
In most living things, the body packages the electrons up into molecules that can safely carry them through the cells until they are dumped on to oxygen.
That’s the way we make all our energy and it’s the same for every organism on this planet .Electrons must flow in order for energy to be gained. This is why when someone suffocates another person they are dead within minutes. You have stopped the supply of oxygen, so the electrons can no longer flow.
The discovery of electric bacteria shows that some very basic forms of life can do away with sugary middlemen and handle the energy in its purest form – electrons, harvested from the surface of minerals. let us go back to the DNA.
The power of light; When God appear to Moses or others he always uses a light, a holy fire and no one can see his glory this living light is completely different than out light energy.Thats why God created his Angels from light first in different degree of light energy to give them different power, Then he created other forms from Fire.
And that’s mean God have the power to change this light energy to different energy forms like fire. If we understand the light we will come closer to understanding God. Photons are the little packets that light comes in.
Confusingly, they, like all particles, behave as both a particle and a wave form .and that is why God selected light to be in Control . We know that radiation and other powerful energy can damage our DNA strings and destroy the genetic informations.
How These DNA be created alone in this universe without damaging the informations in it ?
it must be created first before any other light or energy source and it must be kept protected to make the universe and all the living organism . The universe created with multiple helix strains to create all the minerals later the stars and planets , and the multi helix strings of living organism that go one direction to specific area and deep in our universe to earth in specific time .
While other strings of DNA go to make many other planets with other bacterial life forms , planets with water, diamonds,and every mineral we know and we dont even know yet there is planet for it .Many russian experiments on light ,UV light , the transmission of messages between the cells with UV lights makes it possible that The light play the major role of creation ,sparking the DNA and making the sugar molecular possible for the living cell to evolve. I will explain this fact in different article. Let us go back to the DNA.
A STRAND OF DNA
DNA’s molecular structure does two important things: it maintains the order of the bases, and it protects the bases from chemical degradation. It does that by connecting all the bases to a chemical backbone — a long chain of sugar and phosphate molecules. You can think of a strand of DNA as if it were a long string of Christmas lights. The wire is like the sugar and phosphate molecules, all connected together, and the bases are like four different colored light bulbs. The cord — the backbone of the molecule — stays the same regardless of which light bulb is put into which socket. That describes a single strand of DNA.
COMPLEMENTARY STRANDS
DNA is put together in two strands. Imagine you have two strings of Christmas lights, lying right next to each other. You have the light sockets lined up so there’s an empty socket from each strand right next to an empty socket on the other strand. Now fill the sockets with red, green, blue and white lights. But there’s a rule for putting your lights together: Where you have a red light on one strand, you need to put a green light in the empty socket on the opposite strand. And blue needs to match up with white. That’s like the two strands of DNA. Where there’s an A in one strand there has to be a T in the other, and where there’s a C in one strand there has to be a G in the other.
THE DOUBLE HELIX DNA.
If you had only a single strand of Christmas lights, and you tapped with a tiny hammer along the strand, you might hit only the wire if you tapped on one side of your string of lights. However, you could hit the bulb if you hit on the other side.
You could take your two strands and wrap them around each other, though. As long as you kept the bulbs pointed “in” towards the opposite strand, when you were all done you’d have a long string of lights, but the bulbs would all be on the inside and the wire would be on the outside. The wire protects the bulbs from damage. That’s the same thing that happens with DNA: The sugar-phosphate backbone makes the sides of the double helix, protecting the bases on the inside.
Thats why I think it make sense to theorised of multiple helix strings of a different organism , and when i say multiple I am talking about infinite number .This soup of DNA strings with their electric polarities and bacterial eating energy will mix up and build an efficient cells using light source to feed their hunger .Without the light there will be no sufficient energy to feed these electric energy hungry bacteria.
The light must be created first. That is why the living light must be the God particle , the particle that created it self and selected it self to be in control of all other strings of DNA and all of other forms energies such as the light we know, sound, radio wave, ultra and infrasound, microwaves, ultraviolet rays infrared etc.
Helix DNA are five-carbon molecule called deoxyribose. The new molecule connects to a phosphate group — a small group made from phosphorus and oxygen atoms. Then those pieces connect together to form a string of DNA. It’s kind of like putting together your string of Christmas lights but instead of double line think of trillions and more lines and in microscopic form.
In DNA the phosphate section attached to one base connects to the sugar section attached to the next base. Up to millions of sugars and phosphate groups connect together to make the backbone — the side — of the DNA double helix.
The chemical backbones of the helix are made up of sugar and phosphate molecules that are connected by chemical bonds, known as sugar-phosphate backbones. The two helical strands are connected through interactions between pairs of nucleotides, also called base pairs. Two types of base pairing occur: nucleotide A pairs with T, and nucleotide C pairs with G.
The “theory of everything” is one of the most cherished dreams of science. it will describe the workings of the universe at the most fundamental level and thus encompass our entire understanding of nature. It would also answer such enduring puzzles as what dark matter is ? God particle? The living light ? the reason time flows in only one direction? and how gravity works? Small wonder that Stephen Hawking famously said that such a theory would be “the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God”.
Despite decades of effort, no real progress is made to this theory.Many physicists have confined themselves to developing “quantum gravity” a prerequisite for a theory of everything. But rather than coming up with one or two rival theories whose merits can be judged against the evidence, there is a profusion of candidates that address different parts of the problem and precious few clues as to which (if any) might turn out to be correct.
Here’s a brief guide to some of the front runners.
1 – String theory. Not proven and can not be tested.
2 – Loop quantum gravity ; but they have no true test at all and they can not incorporate gravity into this theory at all.
3 – CDT ; but they have no true test at all and they can not incorporate gravity into this theory at all. It cannot explain the existence of matter.
4 – Quantum Einstein gravity ; This idea, proposed by Martin Reuter of the University of Mainz, Germany,According to conventional theories the force should then become ridiculously strong – which means there’s something wrong with the conventional theories. He then added the fix point and it is not proven or tested,
5 – Quantum graphity
All the theories above assume that space and time exist, and then try to build up the rest of the universe. this Canadian theory tries to do away with them.Not tested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=554zSksLNEM fun to watch.
The past is possibility
According to Hawking and Mlodinow, one consequence of the theory of quantum mechanics is that events in the past that were not directly observed did not happen in a definite way. Instead they happened in all possible ways. This is related to the probabilistic nature of matter and energy revealed by quantum mechanics: Unless forced to choose a particular state by direct interference from an outside observation, things will hover in a state of uncertainty.
For example, if all we know is that a particle traveled from point A to point B, then it is not true that the particle took a definite path and we just don’t know what it is. Rather, that particle simultaneously took every possible path connecting the two points.
Jesus used the secret sign of the fish, exactly like this DNA strings , to draw a picture on the sand to tell other follower where he is staying .
It is like he knows about the strings of DNA double helix , Coincident or what !
But contrary to what Hawking claims, physical laws can never provide a complete explanation of the universe. Laws themselves do not create anything, they are merely a description of what happens under certain conditions.
What Hawking appears to have done is to confuse law with agency. His call on us to choose between God and physics is a bit like someone demanding that we choose between aeronautical engineer Sir Frank Whittle and the laws of physics to explain the jet engine.
Hawking’s argument appears to me even more illogical when he says the existence of gravity means the creation of the universe was inevitable. But how did gravity exist in the first place? Who put it there? And what was the creative force behind its birth? Similarly, when Hawking argues, in support of his theory of spontaneous creation, that it was only necessary for ‘the blue touch paper’ to be lit to ‘set the universe going’, the question must be: where did this blue touch paper come from? And who lit it, if not God? The light source of creation .
The beauty of the scientific laws only reinforces my faith in an intelligent, divine creative force at work. The more I understand science, the more I believe in God because of my wonder at the breadth, sophistication and integrity of his creation.
God is a living light , he created our light energy from his light energy but he is way superior and different than this light we know.
Despite this, Hawking, like so many other critics of religion, wants us to believe we are nothing but a random collection of molecules, the end product of a mindless process. We live in an information age. When we see a few letters of the alphabet spelling our name in the sand, our immediate response is to recognise the work of an intelligent agent. How much more likely, then, is an intelligent creator behind the human DNA, the colossal biological database that contains no fewer than 3.5 billion ‘letters’? Hawking also thinks that the potential existence of other lifeforms in the universe undermines the traditional religious conviction that we are living on a unique, God-created planet. But there is no proof that other lifeforms are out there, and Hawking certainly does not present any.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=554zSksLNEM
Thank you for reading.
Steve Ramsey , PhD. Calgary, Alberta- Canada.