I echo the finding of Dr. Gerald Schroeder earned his BSc, MSc and double-Ph.D. in Nuclear Physics in Earth and Planetary Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught physics for seven years. While a consultant at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission he participated in the formulation of nuclear non-proliferation treaties with the former Soviet Union and witnessed the testing of six atomic bombs. He has served as a consultant to various governments worldwide and has been published in Time, Newsweek and Scientific American. He is the author of Genesis and the big bang, the discovery of harmony between modern science and the Bible, now in seven languages. He is also the author of the Science of God and The hidden face of God. Many other scientists and scholars in different religions in Judaic, Christian, and Islam are trying this method to combine the evolution with the creation and trying to make a sense of the creation history and pinpoint the facts from fiction.

One of the most obvious perceived contradictions between the holy books and science is the age of the universe. Is it billions of years old, like scientific data, or is it thousands of years, like Biblical data? When we add up the generations of the Bible, we come to 5700-plus years in the Bible nd about little more in the Quran.Whereas, data from the Hubble telescope or from the land based telescopes in Hawaii, indicate the age at about 13.8 to 15 billion years.

Let me clarify right at the start. The world may be only some 6000 years old. God could have put the fossils in the ground and juggled the light arriving from distant galaxies to make the world appear to be billions of years old. There is absolutely no way to disprove this claim. God being infinite could have made the world that way. It could be the translation of period as sometimes God uses one God day equal to1000 years in the human count and sometimes as 50,000 years to take an angel to travel to heaven.These are recorded in the holy books the relativity of speed and time was documented in the holy books. God creates time and time for him is relative. There is another possible approach that also agrees with the ancient commentators’ description of God and nature. The world may be young and old simultaneously. In the following, I consider this latter option.

In trying to resolve this apparent conflict, it’s interesting to look historically at trends in knowledge, because absolute proofs are not forthcoming. But what is available is to look at how science has changed its picture of the world, relative to the unchanging picture of the holy books. (I refuse to use modern Biblical commentary because it already knows modern science, and is always influenced by that knowledge. The trend becomes to bend the holy books to match the science.)

So the only data I use as far as Biblical commentary goes is ancient commentary. That means the text of the Bible itself (3300 years ago), the translation of the Torah into Aramaic by Onkelos (100 CE), the Talmud (redacted about the year 500 CE), and the three major Torah commentators. There are many, many commentators, but at the top of the mountain there are three, accepted by all: Rashi (11th century France), who brings the straight understanding of the text, Maimonides (12th century Egypt), who handles the philosophical concepts, and then Nachmanides (13th century Spain), the earliest of the Kabbalists.

This ancient commentary was finalized long before Hubble was a gleam in his great-grandparent’s eye. So there’s no possibility of Hubble or any other modern scientific data influencing these concepts.

Universe with a Beginning

In 1959, a survey was taken of leading American scientists. Among the many questions asked was, “What is your concept of the age of the universe?” Now, in 1959, astronomy was popular, but cosmology ― the deep physics of understanding the universe ― was just developing. The response to that survey was recently republished in Scientific American ― the most widely read science journal in the world. Two-thirds of the scientists gave the same answer: “Beginning? There was no beginning. Aristotle and Plato taught us 2400 years ago that the universe is eternal. Oh, we know the Bible says ‘In the beginning.’ That’s a nice story, but we sophisticates know better. There was no beginning.”

After 3000 years of arguing, science has come to agree with the holy books.That was 1959. In 1965, Penzias and Wilson discovered the echo of the Big Bang in the black of the sky at night, and the world paradigm changed from a universe that was eternal to a universe that had a beginning. After 3000 years of arguing, science has come to agree with the holy books.

Starting from Rosh Hashana ( the new year ) or Ras al-Sana.

How long ago did the “beginning” occur? Was it, as the Bible might imply, 5700-plus years, or was it the 15 billions of years that are accepted by the scientific community?

The first thing we have to understand is the origin of the Biblical calendar. The Jewish year is figured by adding up the generations since Adam. Additionally, there are six days leading up to the creation to Adam. These six days are significant as well.

Now, where do we make the zero point? On Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year, upon blowing the shofar, the following sentence is said: “Hayom Harat Olam ― today is the birthday of the world.”

This verse might imply that Rosh Hashana commemorates the creation of the universe. But it doesn’t. Rosh Hashana commemorates the creation of the Neshama, the soul of human life. We start counting our 5700-plus years from the creation of the soul of Adam. We have a clock that begins with Adam, and the six days are separate from this clock. The holy books have two clocks.

That might seem like a modern rationalization if it were not for the fact that Talmudic commentaries 1500 years ago, brings this information. In the Midrash (Vayikra Rabba 29:1), an expansion of the Talmud, all the Sages agree that Rosh Hashana commemorates the soul of Adam and that the Six Days of Genesis are separate. Christean uses Jesus and Muslim uses Prophit Mohammed birth as the new year but this is just to say that they honor the birthday of those prophets as a symbol of Adam birthday.

Why were the Six Days taken out of the calendar? Because time is described differently in those Six Days of Genesis. “There were evening and morning” is an exotic, bizarre, unusual way of describing time.

Once you come from Adam, the flow of time is totally in human terms. Adam and Eve live 130 years before having children! Seth lives 105 years before having children, etc. From Adam forward, the flow of time is totally human in concept. But prior to that time, it’s an abstract concept: “Evening and morning.” It’s as if you’re looking down on events from a viewpoint that is not intimately related to them.

Deeper into the Text

In trying to understand the flow of time here, you have to remember that the entire Six Days is described in 31 sentences. The Six Days of Genesis, which have given people so many headaches in trying to understand science vis-a-vis the Bible, are confined to 31 sentences! At MIT, in the Hayden library, There are about 50,000 books that deal with the development of the universe: cosmology, chemistry, thermodynamics, paleontology, archaeology, the high-energy physics of creation. At Harvard, at the Weidner library, they probably have 200,000 books on these same topics. The Bible gives us 31 sentences. Don’t expect that by a simple reading of those sentences you’ll know every detail that is held within the text. It’s obvious that we have to dig deeper to get the information out.

The idea of having to dig deeper is not a rationalization. The Talmud (Chagiga, ch. 2) tells us that from the opening sentence of the Bible, through the beginning of Chapter Two, the entire text is given in parable form, a poem with a text and a subtext. Now, again, put yourself into the mindset of 1500 years ago, the time of the Talmud. Why would the Talmud think it was a parable? You think that 1500 years ago they thought that God couldn’t make it all in 6 days? Was it a problem for them? We have a problem today with cosmology and scientific data. But 1500 years ago, what’s the problem with 6 days for an infinitely powerful God? No problem.

So when the Sages excluded these six days from the calendar and said that the entire text is a parable, it wasn’t because they were trying to apologize away what they’d seen in the local museum. There was no local museum. The fact is that a close reading of the text makes it clear that there’s information hidden and folded into layers below the surface.

The idea of looking for a deeper meaning in the holy books is no different from looking for deeper meaning in science. Just as we look for the deeper readings in science to learn the working of nature, so too we need to look for the deeper readings in the holy books. King Solomon in Proverbs 25:11 alluded to this. “A word well spoken is like apples of Gold in a silver dish.” Maimonides in The Guide for the Perplexed interprets this proverb: The silver dish is the literal text of the holy books, as seen from a distance. The apples of gold are the secrets held within the silver dish of the holy books. Thousands of years ago we learned that there are subtleties in the Text that expand the meaning way beyond its simple reading. It’s those subtleties that are so important to read.

Natural History and Human History

There are early Jewish sources that tell us that the Bible’s calendar is in two-parts (even predating Leviticus Rabba which goes back almost 1500 years and says it explicitly). In the closing speech that Moses makes to the people, he says if you want to see the fingerprint of God in the universe, “consider the days of old, the years of the many generations” (Deut. 32:7) Nachmanides said, “Why does Moses break the calendar into two parts ― ‘The days of old, and the years of the many generations?’ Because, ‘Consider the days of old’ is the Six Days of Genesis. ‘The years of the many generations’ is all the time from Adam forward.”

Moses says you can see God’s fingerprint in the universe in one of two ways. Look at the phenomenon of the Six Days, and the development of life in the universe which is mind-boggling. Or if that doesn’t impress you, then just consider society from Adam forward, the phenomenon of human history. Either way, you will find the imprint of God.

Let’s jump back to the Six Days of Genesis. First of all, we now know that when the Biblical calendar says 5700-plus years, we must add to that “plus six days.”

The scientist studied a dinosaur fossil that was dated (by two radioactive decay chains) as 150 million years old. His 7-year-old daughter said, “Abba! Dinosaurs? How can there be dinosaurs 150 million years ago, when my Bible teacher says the world isn’t even 6000 years old?” So he told her to look in Psalms 90:4. There, you’ll find something quite amazing. King David says, “One thousand years in Your (God’s) sight are like a day that passes, a watch in the night.” Perhaps the time is different from the perspective of King David than it is from the perspective of the Creator. Perhaps the time is different. I add that the Holy Quran echo similar time regarding one day in God count equal 1000 human years.The Other verses in the Quran mentioned that some angel take 1000 years to travel to heaven and some take 50,000 years, so time, speed and periods are different in God time and human time.

The Talmud (Chagiga, ch. 2), in trying to understand the subtleties of Torah, analyzes the word “choshech.” When the word “choshech” appears in Genesis 1:2, the Talmud explains that it means black fire, black energy, a kind of energy that is so powerful you can’t even see it. Two verses later, in Genesis 1:4, the Talmud explains that the same word ― “choshech” ― means darkness, i.e. the absence of light.

Other words as well are not to be understood by their common definitions. For example, “mayim” typically means water. But Maimonides says that in the original statements of creation, the word “mayim” may also mean the building blocks of the universe.The Quran Uses water in Arabic as God Created everything in the universe from water and he goes specifically to say that he created Adam from mud/ clay ( sand and water mix) that was put on fire of creation to be hardened like a clay jar.

Another example is Genesis 1:5, which says, “There are evening and morning, Day One.” That is the first time that a day is quantified: evening and morning. Nachmanides discusses the meaning of evening and morning. Does it mean sunset and sunrise? It would certainly seem to.

But Nachmanides points out a problem with that. The text says “there were evening and morning Day One… evening and morning a second day… evening and morning a third day.” Then on the fourth day, the sun is mentioned. Nachmanides says that any intelligent reader can see an obvious problem. How do we have a concept of evening and morning for the first three days if the sun is only mentioned on Day Four? There is a purpose for the sun appearing only on Day Four so that as time goes by and people understand more about the universe, you can dig deeper into the text.

Nachmanides says the text uses the words “Vayehi Erev” ― but it doesn’t mean “there was evening.” He explains that the Hebrew letters GAyin, Resh, Bet ― the root of “Gereb” ,is chaos. The mixture, disorder. That’s why the evening is called “Gereb”, in Arabic ghereb mean after sunset as the night is called leel. because when the sun goes down, vision becomes blurry. The literal meaning is “there was a disorder.” The Torah’s word for “morning” ― “boker” ― is the absolute opposite. When the sun rises, the world becomes “bikoret”, orderly, able to be discerned. That’s why the sun needn’t be mentioned until Day Four. Because from gereb or gherev to boker is a flow from disorder to order, from chaos to the cosmos. Bokera is next day in arabic or new day. That’s something any scientist will testify never happens in an unguided system.

Order never arises from disorder spontaneously and remains orderly. Order always degrades to chaos unless the environment recognizes the order and locks it in to preserve it. There must be a guide to the system. That’s an unequivocal statement.

The holy books want us to be amazed by this flow, starting from a chaotic plasma and ending up with a symphony of life. Day-by-day the world progresses to higher and higher levels. Order out of disorder. It’s pure thermodynamics. And it’s stated in the terminology of 3000 years ago.

The Creation of Time

Each day of creation is numbered. Yet there is a discontinuity in the way the days are numbered. The verse says: “There are evening and morning, Day One.” But the second day doesn’t say “evening and morning, Day Two.” Rather, it says “evening and morning, a second day.” And the Holy books continues with this pattern: “Evening and morning, a third day… a fourth day… a fifth day… the sixth day.” Only on the first day does the text use a different form: not “first day,” but “Day One” (“Yom Echad”) or AHAD. Many English translations make the mistake of writing “the first day.” That’s because editors want things to be nice and consistent. But they throw out the cosmic message in the text! Because there is a qualitative difference, as Nachmanides says, between “one” and “first.” One is absolute; first is comparative. That’s why I think God mentioned AHAD as day one, the first, the only one that first as God is one and only one and no one else beside him before him and everything created by him and he put that in the first thing of the 10 commandments

Nachmanides explains that on Day One, time was created. That’s a phenomenal insight. Time was created. You can’t grab time. You don’t even see it. You can see space, you can see matter, you can feel energy, you can see light energy. I understand a creation there. But the creation of time? Eight hundred years ago, Nachmanides attained this insight from the Torah’s use of the phrase, “Day One.” And that’s exactly what Einstein taught us in the Laws of Relativity: that there was a creation, not just of space and matter, but of time itself.

Einstein’s Law of Relativity

Looking back in time, a scientist will view the universe as being 13 to 15 billion years old. But what is the Bible’s view of time? Maybe it sees time differently. And that makes a big difference. Albert Einstein taught us that Big Bang cosmology brings not just space and matter into existence, but that time is part of the nitty gritty. Time is a dimension. Time is affected by your view of time. How you see time depends on where you’re viewing it. A minute on the moon goes faster than a minute on the Earth. A minute on the sun goes slower. Time on the sun is actually stretched out so that if you could put a clock on the sun, it would tick more slowly. It’s a small difference, but it’s measurable and measured.

The flow of time varies one location to another location. Hence the term: the law of relativity.

If you could ripen oranges on the Sun, they would take longer to ripen. Why? Because time goes more slowly. Would you feel it going more slowly? No, because your biology would be part of the system. If you were living on the Sun, your heart would beat more slowly. Wherever you are, your biology is in synch with the local time. And a minute or an hour where ever you are is exactly a minute or an hour.

If you could look from one system to another, you would see time very differently. Because depending on factors like gravity and velocity, you will perceive time in a way that is very different. The flow of time varies one location to another location. Hence the term: the law of relativity.

But which is correct? Is it three years? Or three minutes? The answer is both. They’re both happening at the same time. That’s the legacy of Albert Einstein. It so happens there are literally billions of locations in the universe, where if you could put a clock at that location, it would tick so slowly, that from our perspective (if we could last that long) 15 billion years would go by, but the clock at that remote location would tick six days.

Time Travel and the Big Bang

But how does this help to explain the Bible? Because anyway the Talmud and Rashi and Nahmanides (that is the Kabala) all say that Six Days of Genesis were six regular 24-hour periods not longer than our work week!

Let’s look a bit deeper. The classical Jewish sources say that before the beginning, we don’t really know what there is. We can’t tell what predates the universe. The Midrash asks the question: Why does the Bible begin with the letter Beit? Because Beit b (which is written like a backward C) is closed in all directions and only open in the forward direction. Hence we can’t know what comes before ― only after. The first letter is a Beit ― closed in all directions and only open in the forward direction. The Quran also Start with letter b,bismellah al-Rahman al-Raheem, as it is the first verse from al fateha.The opening of the Holy book.

Nachmanides expands the statement. He says that although the days are 24 hours each, they contain “kol yemot ha-olam” ― all the ages and all the secrets of the world. In Arabic this could be translated to everything will end and die and only God will stay in the end as he started everything in the beginning.

Nachmanides says that before the universe, there was nothing… but then suddenly the entire creation appeared as a minuscule speck. He gives a dimension for the speck something very tiny like the size of a grain of mustard. The Quran also mentioned this as the khardal seed. And he says that is the only physical creation.

There was no other physical creation; all other creations were spiritual. The Nefesh (the soul of animal life) and the Neshama (the soul of human life) are spiritual creations. There’s only one physical creation, and that creation was a tiny speck. The speck is all there was.

Anything else was God. In that speck was all the raw material that would be used for making everything else. Nachmanides describes the substance as “dak me’od, ein bo mamash” smaller than a grain of muster seed in size so soft water of creation, no substance to it. And as this speck expanded out, this substance, so thin that it has no essence, turned into matter as we know it. The Quran mentioned that it is Water the water of creation that God make everything else with.

Nachmanides further writes: “Misheyesh, yitfos bo zman” — from the moment that matter formed from this substance-less substance, time grabs hold. Not “begins.” Time is created at the beginning. But time “grabs hold.” When matter condenses, congeals, coalesces, out of this substance so thin it has no essence ― that’s when the Biblical and Holy books clock of the six days starts.

Science has shown that there’s only one “substance-less substance” that can change into matter. And that’s energy. Einstein’s famous equation, E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold.

Nachmanides has made a phenomenal statement. I don’t know if he knew the Laws of Relativity. But we know them now. We know that energy, light beams, radio waves, gamma rays, x-rays, all travel at the speed of light, 300 million meters per second. At the speed of light, time does not pass. The universe was aging, but time only grabs hold when the matter is present. This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A minuscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck to about the size of the Solar System. From that moment on, we have mater, and time flows forward. The Biblical and Holy books clock begins here.

Now the fact that the Holy books tell us there is “evening and morning Day One” (and not “the first day”) comes to teach us time from a Biblical perspective. Einstein proved that time varies from place to place in the universe, and that time varies from perspective to perspective in the universe. The Holy books say there is “evening and morning Day One”.

Now if the Torah were seeing time from the days of Moses and Mount Sinai, long after Adam, the text would not have written Day One. Because by Sinai, hundreds of thousands of days already passed. There was a lot of time with which to compare Day One. Torah would have said “The First Day.” By the second day of Genesis, the Bible says “the second day,” because there was already the First Day with which to compare it. You could say on the second day, “what happened on the first day.” But as Nahmanides pointed out, you could not say on the first day, “what happened on the first day” because “first” implies comparison ― an existing series. And there was no existing series. Day One was all there was.

Even if the Torah was seeing time from Adam, the text would have said “the first day”, because by its own statement there were six days. The Torah says “Day One” because the Torah is looking forward from the beginning. And it says, How old is the universe? Six Days. We’ll just take time up until Adam. Six Days. We look back in time and say the universe is approximately 15 billion years old.

But every scientist knows, that when we say the universe is 15 billion years old, there’s another half of the sentence that we never say. The other half of the sentence is: The universe is 15 billion years old as seen from the time-space coordinates that we exist in on earth. That’s Einstein’s view of relativity. But what would those billions of years be as perceived from near the beginning looking forward?

The key is that the Holy Books looks forward in time, from very different time-space coordinates, when the universe was small. But since then, the universe has expanded out. Space stretches, and that stretching of space totally changes the perception of time.

Imagine in your mind going back billions of years ago to the beginning of time. Now pretend way back at the beginning of time, when time grabs hold, there’s an intelligent community. (It’s totally fictitious.) Imagine that the intelligent community has a laser, and it’s going to shoot out a blast of light, and every second it’s going to pulse. Every second ― pulse. Pulse. Pulse. It shoots the light out, and then billions of years later, way far down the time line, we here on Earth have a big satellite dish, and we receive that pulse of light. And on that pulse of light is imprinted (printing information on light is called fiber optics ― sending information by light), “I’m sending you a pulse every second.” And then a second goes by and the next pulse is sent.

Light travels 300 million meters per second. So the two light pulses are separated by 300 million meters at the beginning. Now they travel through space for billions of years, and they’re going to reach the Earth billions of years later. But wait a minute. Is the universe static? No. The universe is expanding. The Quran also mentioned that more than 1400 years ago and mentioned beside the expansion the black halls and many more scientific facts.That’s the cosmology of the universe. And that does not mean it’s expanding into an empty space outside the universe. There’s only the universe. There is no space outside the universe. The universe expands by its own space stretching. So as these pulses go through billions of years of traveling, the universe and space are stretching. As space is stretching, what’s happening to these pulses? The space between them is also stretching. So the pulses really get further and further apart.

Billions of years later, when the first pulse arrives, we say, “Wow ― a pulse!” And written on it is “I’m sending you a pulse every second.” You call all your friends, and you wait for the next pulse to arrive. Does it arrive another second later? No! A year later? Maybe not. Maybe billions of years later. Because depending on how much time this pulse of light has traveled through space, will determine the amount of stretching of space between the pulses. That’s standard astronomy.

15 Billion or Six Days?

Today, we look back in time. We see 15 billion years. Looking forward from when the universe is very small ― billions of times smaller ― the Holy books say six days. They both may be correct.

What’s exciting about the last few years in cosmology is we now have quantified the data to know the relationship of the “view of time” from the beginning, relative to the “view of time” today. It’s not science fiction any longer. Any one of a dozen physics textbooks all bring the same number.

The general relationship between time near the beginning when stable matter formed from the light (the energy, the electromagnetic radiation of the creation) and time today is a trillion fold extension. That’s a 1 with 12 zeros after it. It is a unit-less ratio. So when a view from the beginning looking forward says “I’m sending you a pulse every second,” would we see it every second? No. We’d see it every million- million seconds. Because that’s the stretching effect of the expansion of the universe. In astronomy, the term is “red shift.” Red shift in observed astronomical data is standard.

The Holy books doesn’t say every second, does it? It says Six Days. How would we see those six days? If the Holy books say we’re sending information for six days, would we receive that information as six days? No. We would receive that information as six million- million days. Because the Holy book’s perspective is from the beginning looking forward.

Six million -million days is a very interesting number. What would that be in years? Divide by 365 and it comes out to be 16 billion years. Essentially the estimate of the age of the universe. Not a bad guess for 3300 years ago.

Now we can go one step further. Let’s look at the development of time, day-by-day, based on the expansion factor. Every time the universe doubles, the perception of time is cut in half. Now when the universe was small, it was doubling very rapidly. But as the universe gets bigger, the doubling time gets longer. This rate of expansion is quoted in “The Principles of Physical Cosmology,” a textbook that is used literally around the world.

(In case you want to know, this exponential rate of expansion has a specific number averaged at 10 to the 12th power. That is, in fact, the temperature of quark confinement, when matter freezes out of the energy: 10.9 times 10 to the 12th power Kelvin degrees divided by (or the ratio to) the temperature of the universe today, 2.73 degrees. That’s the initial ratio which changes exponentially as the universe expands.)

The calculations come out to be as follows:

• The first of the Biblical days lasted 24 hours, viewed from the “beginning of time perspective.” But the duration from our perspective was 8 billion years.

• The second day, from the Bible’s perspective, lasted 24 hours. From our perspective, it lasted half of the previous day, 4 billion years.

• The third 24 hour day also included half of the previous day, 2 billion years.

• The fourth 24 hour day ― one billion years.

• The fifth 24 hour day ― one-half billion years.

• The sixth 24 hour day ― one-quarter billion years.

7th day = 125,000 billion years.

When you add up the Six Days, you get the age of the universe at 15 .875 billion years. The same as modern cosmology or even better as they teach us that the age of the universe is around 13.6 billion years. Is it by chance?

But there’s more. The Holy books go out on a limb and tell you what happened on each of those days. Now you can take cosmology, paleontology, archaeology, and look at the history of the world, and see whether or not they match up day-by-day. And trust me they match up so close.

I think, and God Knows best of course that our universe, our solar systems, all the suns, and stars will end in about 3,125 billion years from now in our human time.I will have a different article regarding this math and it all has to do with 19 billion years as the end of everything. as the start of the verse in the Quran = 19 letters, and in the Bible mentioned number 19 The Meaning of Number 19 in so many verses. Nineteen, which is usually denoted God’s perfect order in regard to his judgment. The names Job and Eve, if we substitute letters for numbers, add up to 19. Israel was ruled by a total of nineteen kings before God allowed them to be conquered by the Assyrians.

Discovered in 1947, the Dead Sea Scrolls were found east of Jerusalem. Among all the scrolls unearthed over the years, 19 copies of Isaiah the prophet have been identified.Of the ten most frequently mentioned women in the Bible. Mary(Jesus’ mother) is listed 19 times. The Holy Quran 19;19 is a chapter called Maryam ( Mary ) mother of Jesus.

He said, “I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you [news of] a pure boy.” Jesus birth.

Matthew 19:19 honor your father and mother. God put parents in the ten commandments as the giver of life and we must honor them to the end.

19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to do battle with the one who rode the horse and with his army. This verse talks about the end of time wars see Revelation 19-19. These are just few example of hundreds of verses from the holy books.

• Nineteen chapters of the book of the Wisdom of the Ancient Testament.
• The nineteen sons of David who were born to him when he was in Hebron and in Jerusalem. (1 Ch 3,1-9)
• The nineteen strong towns of the tribe of Naphtali. (Jos 19,38).

The 19th name of God is Al-Alim (العليم) The All Knowing, the Omniscient he kept this knowledge for himself as know one knows the exact time of each other death or the end of time only God knows when.

19th known Prophet from Adam is Ayub – Job that was touched by sickness and disease that almost destroyed his body and got to the end of his life as God test of his patient and faith but in the end because of his faith God saved him by his mercy.

Scientists also predict the end of the universe by year 19 billion as the said that Our universe has existed for nearly 14 billion years, and as far as most people are concerned, the universe should continue to exist for 5 billions of years more.

But according to a new paper, there’s one theory for the region of the universe that predicts time itself will end in just five billion years—coincidentally, right around the time our sun is slated to die in 2.7 billion years.The prediction comes from the theory of eternal inflation, which says our universe is part of the multiverse. This vast structure is made up of an infinite number of universes, each of which can spawn an infinite number of daughter universes. (Related: “New Proof Unknown ‘Structures’ Tug at Our Universe.”)

Thank you for reading

Steve Ramsey, Ph.D.- Calgary – Alberta- Canada